David Hume’s Empiricism and Its Contribution to The Integration of Science, Culture, Technology, and Religion

Authors

  • Budi Harianto Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Hasnah Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Syukri Syukri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v9i4.4732

Keywords:

David Hume, Empiricism, Science, Culture, Technology, Religion, Integration

Abstract

The integration of science with cultural, technological, and religious dimensions is an urgent discourse in contemporary thought, particularly in addressing epistemological fragmentation. David Hume’s empiricism offers a critical contribution to this discussion through its emphasis on sensory impressions as the foundation of knowledge and its radical critique of causality and induction. This study aims to analyze the position of empiricism in the philosophy of science, examine Hume’s role in advancing empiricism, and explain the relevance of his thought in integrating science with culture, technology, and religion. Using a qualitative, library-based approach, this research draws from books, articles, and previous studies, with descriptive analysis applied to interpret and contextualize Hume’s ideas. The findings show that in the realm of culture, empiricism provides a methodological basis for studying social practices as products of lived experience, while simultaneously highlighting the need for ethical and normative reflection. In technology, Hume’s insistence on observation and verification strengthens empirical testing, whereas his skepticism toward causality and induction fosters caution and repetition in innovation, laying the groundwork for logical empiricism. In religion, Hume’s thought underscores the limits of empirical reasoning but allows religious experience to be studied phenomenologically, while its normative truth remains grounded in revelation and faith. The conclusion emphasizes that Hume’s empiricism not only reinforces methodological rigor but also opens a dialogical epistemology in which experience, reason, and revelation coexist. Thus, integrating empiricism into contemporary scholarship contributes to the development of science that is empirically valid, ethically responsible, and culturally and spiritually meaningful.

References

Alim, M., Rahman, F., & Zaki, A. (2024). Perdebatan Rasionalisme Dan Empirisme Dalam Filsafat Modern. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(1), 12-30.

Amin, R. (2020). Dari Hume ke Lingkaran Wina: Akar Empirisme Logis Dalam Sains Modern. Jurnal Filsafat Sains, 3(2), 88-105.

Anwar, S. (2023). Epistemologi Sains Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Studia Islamika, 30(2), 123-145.

Bakar, O. (2021). Islamic Civilisation And The Modern World. Bandar: UBD Press.

Capra, F. (2022). The Turning Point: Science, Society, And The Rising Culture. New York: Bantam Books.

Daulay, A. R., & Salminawati, S. (2022). Fragmentasi Keilmuan Dan Integrasi Sains Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 45-62.

Dini, A., & Abi, M. (2022). Integrasi Nilai Budaya Dalam Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 46(2), 112-128.

Erfans, T., Sari, N., & Putra, D. (2024). Dinamika Budaya Dan Metode Empiris Dalam Studi Etnografi. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 18(1), 77-95.

Farunik, A., & Dharma, R. (2023). Epistemologi Islam Kontemporer: Wahyu, Akal Dan Indera. Jurnal Studia Islamika, 30(1), 45-67.

Febriana, D., & Astuti, S. (2025). Integrasi Sains Dan Agama Dalam Peradaban Islam. Jakarta: Kencana.

Good, R. (2002). Empiricism And The Foundations Of Scientific Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 411-432.

Hardiman, F. B. (2004). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hume, D. (2021). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, D. (2021). A Treatise Of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaelan, K. (2022). Metode Penelitian Filsafat. Tangerang: Paradigma.

Machmud, S. (2011). Kritik Hume Terhadap Kausalitas Dan Induksi. Jurnal Filsafat UGM, 21(2), 134-150.

Mulkhan, A. M. (2024). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Tantangan Sains Modern. Jurnal Filsafat UGM, 34(1), 1-18.

Munir, M. (2024). Verifikasi Indrawi Dan Batas-Batas Klaim Ilmiah Menurut David Hume. Jurnal Epistemologi, 5(1), 33-50.

Muslih, M. (2024). Filsafat Ilmu Imre Lakatos Dan Metodologi Pengembangan Sains Islam. TASFIYAH; Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(1), 46-90.

Pakpahan, R., Siregar, M., & Lubis, A. (2024). Integrasi Sains Dan Agama Di Era Postmodernisme. Jurnal Islamica, 18(2), 201-220.

Palada, S., et al. (2021). Kausalitas Dan Induksi Dalam Kerangka Empirisme Hume. Jurnal Logika dan Filsafat, 9(2), 60-75.

Sari, L., & Sirait, B. (2021). Metode Empiris Dalam Kajian Budaya Kontemporer. Jurnal Kebudayaan, 16(3), 201-218.

Saifullah, S., & Fuad, M. (2016). Integrasi Ilmu Dan Agama Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Tinggi Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 13(2), 145-160.

Sativa, E. (2020). Teknologi Sebagai Applied Science: Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Teknologi dan Masyarakat, 8(1), 22-35.

Suyudi, B., & Putra, A. (2020). Problem Induksi Dalam Epistemologi Hume. Jurnal Filsafat Sains, 3(2), 110-125.

Soemantri, T. (2022). Kritik Rasionalisme Dan Kebangkitan Empirisme. Bandung, Indonesia: Mizan.

Sahib, M. (2025). David Hume Dan Kritik Terhadap Kausalitas. Jurnal Filsafat UGM, 35(1), 88-102.

Thahar, H. (2023). Filsafat Ilmu: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Trirahmayati, M., et al. (2025). Dialektika Sains Dan Budaya: Menuju Integrasi Epistemik. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 12(1), 55-73.

Wilhelm, T., & Berkeley, G. (2025). Modern Empiricism: From Bacon To Berkeley. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

14-09-2026

How to Cite

Harianto , B., Nasution, H., & Syukri, S. (2026). David Hume’s Empiricism and Its Contribution to The Integration of Science, Culture, Technology, and Religion. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 9(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v9i4.4732