Pengaruh Model Case Based Learning Berbantuan E-LKM Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Murid SMA

Authors

  • Ni Ketut Sri Wedani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Santyasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Komang Sudarma Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i3.5467

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Case Based Learning, E-LKM, Mathematics, Learning Achievement

Abstract

Low mathematics achievement among Indonesian students, evidenced by a PISA 2022 score of 354 points below the OECD average of 485, underscores the need for innovative pedagogy.The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a case-based learning (CBL) model integrated with Electronic Student Worksheets (E-LKM) on critical thinking skills and mathematics achievement, compared to CBL alone and Direct Instruction (DI). A quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design was employed at SMA Negeri 2 Amlapura, Bali, even semester 2025/2026. Three classes were selected through simple random sampling from 369 grade XI students: CBL+E-LKM (n = 35), CBL (n = 35), and DI (n = 34). Critical thinking skills were measured using essay-based tests and mathematics achievement using multiple-choice tests, analyzed with MANCOVA in IBM SPSS 26.0. Results revealed: (1) the three groups differed significantly in both variables simultaneously (Pillai's Trace F = 48.074; p < 0.001); (2) critical thinking skills differed significantly, with posttest means of CBL+E-LKM (M = 32.29; very high), CBL (M = 30.63; high), and DI (M = 24.32; high), F = 905.294, p < 0.001; and (3) mathematics achievement followed the same superiority order, CBL+E-LKM (M = 7.66), CBL (M = 7.26), and DI (M = 6.29), F = 139.284, p < 0.001. These findings confirm that integrating E-LKM into CBL simultaneously enhances critical thinking skills and mathematics achievement through authentic case contexts and adaptive digital scaffolding, making CBL+E-LKM a recommended model for higher-order thinking instruction in mathematics.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing: A Revision Of Bloom's Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Harlow: Longman.

Astuti, Y., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2020). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berbasis Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Murid SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 120-132.

Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2017). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif dan Konteksual. Jakarta Timur: Prenada Media.

Dharmayanthi, N. P. I. (2023). Penerapan Model Case Based Learning (CBL) Untuk Mengembangkan Critical Thinking Skills Murid Dalam Pembelajaran Geografi Di SMA Negeri 1 Kuta Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 10(3), 291-300.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is And Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1-23.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis; A Global Perspective. London: Pearson Education

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought And Knowledge: An Introduction To Critical Thinking. New York: Psychology Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A Synthesis Of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating To Achievement. London: Routledge.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model Of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

Kurniawan, A., Sujadi, I., & Pramudya, I. (2021). Efektivitas E-LKS Berbasis Scientific Approach Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 45-58.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual Coding Theory: Retrospect And Current Status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 45(3), 255-287.

Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound?. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.

Puspitasari, N., Wulandari, S., & Hidayat, A. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Murid Elektronik (E-LKM) Interaktif Berbasis Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(2), 134-145.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles Of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know. American Educator, 36(1), 12-39.

Santyasa, I. W., Warpala, I. W. S., & Tegeh, I. M. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Terhadap Keterlibatan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 1-15.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. London: Pearson Education.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development Of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Widjayanti, D. B., Hanum, F., & Sugiman, S. (2019). Keefektifan Lembar Kerja Elektronik Interaktif Dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 204-215.

Wijaya, I. K. W. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Tegeh, I. M. (2024). Pengaruh Model Case Based Learning Berbantuan Video Kontekstual Terhadap Literasi Sains Dan Prestasi Belajar fisika murid SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 14(1), 35-47.

Wospakrik, F., Tuasamu, M., & Wula, P. (2020). Case Based Learning Sebagai Pendekatan Pembelajaran Untuk Mengembangkan HOTS. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 123-132.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming A Self-Regulated Learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Downloads

Published

08-06-2026

How to Cite

Sri Wedani, N. K., Santyasa, I. W., & Sudarma, I. K. (2026). Pengaruh Model Case Based Learning Berbantuan E-LKM Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Murid SMA. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(3), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i3.5467