Evaluasi Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Asesmen Nasional Pada SMP Negeri Di Kecamatan Baturiti Tahun 2024

Authors

  • I Made Wargina SMP Negeri 3 Baturiti
  • I Made Candiasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i1.4661

Keywords:

National Assessment, Effectiveness, Evaluative

Abstract

Based on regarding policies in Curriculum Merdeka, the National Assessment (AN), Character Survey, and Learning Environment Survey (Sulingjar) are conducted as forms of education system evaluation. Since there are still several aspects in Junior High School in Baturiti belong to low categories that need improvement, it is significant to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of AN for Junior High School in Baturiti, as no evaluation of the effectiveness of AN has ever been conducted at Junior High School in Baturiti. Following this explanation, how effective is the implementation of AN at Junior High School in Baturiti? This study aims to describe the effectiveness of AN implementation at SMP Negeri Baturiti in terms of content, input, process, and product (CIPP). This study is expected to provide can contribute to education field, particularly regarding AN implementation, as well as for further research development. This study is evaluative and uses a mixed-method approach. The results of this study show the effectiveness of the implementation of AN in junior high schools in Baturiti in the components of context, input, process, and product. The principal group showed effective results, the technician group showed effective results, the proctor group showed effective results, and the teacher group showed effective results, while the student group showed fairly effective results. In addition to technical problem in implementing the National Assessment, there were also several other challenges, such as the large number of instruments answered by teachers and students and insufficient time to complete the instruments. The types of instruments were diverse,teachers and students were not yet accustomed to the variety of instruments.

References

Absawati, H. (2020). Telaah Sistem Pendidikan Finlandia: Penerapan Sistem Pendidikan Terbaik Dunia Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementary: Kajian Teori Dan Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 64-70.

Arikunto, S., Jabar, & Cepi, S. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Asrul, A., Ananda, R., & Rosnita, R. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Citapustaka Media.

Candiasa, I. M. (2019). Analisis Data dengan Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.

Divayana, D. G. H. (2018). Evaluasi Program Konsep Dasar dan Pengimplementasiannya. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Fauziah, A., Sobari, E. F. D., & Robandi, B. (2021). Analisis Pemahaman Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Mengenai Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1550-1558.

Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi, N. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study). Seminar Nasional & Call for Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi.

Indahri, Y. (2016). Moratorium Ujian Nasional. Majalah Info Singkat, 8(23), 9-12.

Indahri, Y. (2021). Asesmen Nasional Sebagai Pilihan Evaluasi Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 12(2), 195-215.

Latif, Y. (2019). Pendidikan Yang Berkebudayaan: Histori, Konsepsi dan Aktualisasi Pendidikan Transformatif. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mulyasa. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Martiyono, M., Sulastini, R., & Handajani, S. (2021). Asesmen Kompetensi Minimal (AKM) dalam Mewujudkan Sekolah Efektif di SMP Negeri 1 Kebumen Kabupaten Kebumen Perspektif Manajemen Kurikulum dan Sistem Penilaian. Cakrawala: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Dan Studi Sosial, 5(2), 92-110.

Morse, J. M. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip Metode Campuran dan Rancangan Penelitian Multimetode. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2021). Asesmen Nasional, Lembar Tanya Jawab. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran.

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, B. N., Alfiah, L. N., Peni, R., Wahyudi, B., Wahyudi, A., & Widarti, H. R. (2021). Analisis Kesiapan Peserta Didik Dan Guru Pada Asesmen Nasional (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum, Survey Karakter, Dan Survey Lingkungan Belajar). JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 61-71.

Sari, V. P., & Sayekti, I. C. (2022). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Pada Kompetensi Dasar Literasi Membaca Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 5237-5243.

Retnawati, H. (2022). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing,

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi Untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2022). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Ustama, D. D. (2009). Peranan Pendidikan Dalam Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(9), 1-12.

Downloads

Published

02-01-2026

How to Cite

Wargina, I. M., Candiasa, I. M., & Pujawan, I. G. N. (2026). Evaluasi Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Asesmen Nasional Pada SMP Negeri Di Kecamatan Baturiti Tahun 2024. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v9i1.4661

Issue

Section

Articles